This story is concerning the proposed new World Well being Group pandemic treaty that may probably eradicate the nationwide sovereignty as we all know it. It’s also concerning the banality of evil and the impression of our particular person every day selections on the long run generations and the historical past of the world.
What’s the Deal With the World Well being Group Pandemic Treaty?
In December 2021, the World Well being Group introduced their plan to develop a brand new pandemic treaty “strengthening” worldwide cooperation throughout future pandemics. What does it imply in sensible phrases? The language of the announcement was obscure, so we have to interpret it in context. Right here’s from the horse’s mouth: (December 2021):
“In a consensus determination aimed toward defending the world from future infectious ailments crises, the World Well being Meeting at present agreed to kickstart a world course of to draft and negotiate a conference, settlement or different worldwide instrument underneath the Structure of the World Well being Group to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-Common, stated the choice by the World Well being Meeting was historic in nature, important in its mission, and represented a once-in-a-generation alternative to strengthen the worldwide well being structure to guard and promote the well-being of all folks.”
Extra from the horse’s mouth (April 2022):
“In a consensus determination aimed toward defending the world from future infectious ailments crises, in December 2021 the World Well being Meeting agreed to kickstart a world course of by establishing an intergovernmental negotiating physique (INB) to draft and negotiate a conference, settlement or different worldwide instrument underneath the Structure of the World Well being Group to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response …
As a part of this historic determination, the World Well being Meeting requested the Director-Common to carry public hearings, consistent with normal WHO follow, to help the work of the INB. Per the INB’s timeline, the primary spherical of these hearings has been set for 12-13 April 2022, with a second spherical set for 16-17 June. This data on the modalities for the primary spherical of hearings can also be anticipated to use to the second spherical as properly.”
Lies, Lies, Lies
Let’s begin with the difficulty of distorted language. In an sincere world with no darkish agendas, no Fourth Industrial Revolution, and no upside-down language, their treaty may sound like a phenomenal thought. Like, what can presumably be mistaken with benevolently guided, significant worldwide cooperation throughout a time of disaster? An exquisite fairy story, no?
Sadly, not a fairy story in any respect however extra like a horror film as a result of we live in a world of shameless mendacity and upside-down language — and the phrases now not imply what they’re purported to imply.
To deceive us, the bureaucrats are attempting to create a sense in our minds that they getting collectively to guard us, like a benevolent council of smart indigenous grandmothers — whereas in actuality, it’s extra like they’re aiming to entice us, being a gang of grasping and ruthless wolves in sheep’s garments that they’re.
“Well being” doesn’t imply precise well being however slightly the promotion of any product or interference that’s fascinating to the shareholders and the CEOs of pharmaceutical and know-how firms.
Similar to Fauci lately equated himself with science, the company mouthpieces equate no matter they need to promote or impose on us with “well being,” after which say they’re defending our “well being” whereas in truth, they’re merely defending their pockets.
We live in a world the place our leaders (translation: our fellow human being who don’t have any intrinsic higher hand on us however who’ve gotten forward on the premise of being extraordinarily power-hungry) are taking full benefit of the truth that in an effort to do harmful issues with the least resistance, then can name them “helpful issues which might be good for the folks,” and get away with it for a while. That’s the trick!
And apart from, if the previous two years are any indication, “worldwide cooperation” means in follow that every one WEF-affiliated leaders go forward and throw their folks underneath the bus in unison, to the sound of uniform messaging within the media.
“Worldwide cooperation” implies that all nations do the identical harmful factor, leading to pointless human demise and struggling, a disruption of social buildings and the world financial system, all to clear the best way for his or her favourite “new regular.” That’s some worldwide cooperation!
Public Hearings
Given the self-proclaimed historic nature of this treaty, the World Well being Group devoted the entire two days to the primary spherical of the public hearings (and so they didn’t promote it a lot). The primary spherical occurred in April 2022. The second spherical shall be held in June of this yr.
Dr. Tess Lawrie wrote a really transferring article concerning the WHO pandemic treaty and the video remark submission by the World Council for Well being.
Listed here are Dr. Lawrie’s feedback on the proposed treaty, after she had an opportunity to take part in a name with the WHO (in addition to UNAIDS, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Improvements, the UN Surroundings Programme, and the Affiliation of Southeast Asian Nations) as part of the submission course of.
• Requires ‘human safety centric’ not simply ‘well being safety centric’. Apparently, they don’t simply need to management your physique however each facet of your life.
• Quick approval of emergency diagnostics – and unified regulatory registration for diagnostics. In different phrases, extra management.
• Equitable entry to vaccines and ‘a mechanism to carry violators accountable’. So if a nation concludes a vaccine will not be protected – as has occurred on this final pandemic – the WHO would have the ability to override that and jab their inhabitants anyway.
• Vaccines ought to be developed inside 100 days. That is absurd. Secure medication take ten years to be adequately examined and declared protected. There are greater than 3.5 million folks on the WHO database who’ve been harmed by Covid vaccines and this can be the tip of the iceberg.
I agree that these bullet factors sound prefer it’s about management, so no shock that it comes with extra censorship!
Extra Censorship
Whereas the general public feedback had been open, the #StopTheTreaty marketing campaign by the World Council for Well being, the place Dr. Tess Lawrie is on the Steering Committee, was the discuss of the city within the “freedom group.” However when you looked for it on Google, you wouldn’t know something about it! Right here’s what I wrote only a few hours after the remark interval ended:
“Should you seek for the phrase “WHO pandemic treaty” on DuckDuckGo, #StopTheTreaty comes up among the many high outcomes. On Google although no such factor exists. Should you truly seek for the phrase “cease the treaty,” on DuckDuckGo #StoopTheTreaty is the primary outcome. Google, however, tells you the whole lot you ever needed to know concerning the 1919 Treaty of Versailles!)”
For the World Well being Group, It’s Not the First Rodeo
It’s curious that it’s not the primary time that the WHO is making an attempt serve the pharmaceutical trade and varied trade shareholders utilizing “pandemic preparedness” as a authorized device.
For instance, in 2009, they introduced an influenza pandemic (H1N1) that activated vaccine buying agreements and compelled collaborating nations to giant batches of doses that they didn’t want. The rushed launch of a subpar medical product led to a “narcolepsy fiasco,” amongst different issues.
In response to the report by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Meeting:
“The Parliamentary Meeting is alarmed about the best way wherein the H1N1 influenza pandemic has been dealt with, not solely by the World Well being Group (WHO), but in addition by the competent well being authorities on the degree of the European Union and at nationwide degree.
It’s significantly troubled by among the penalties of selections taken and recommendation given resulting in distortion of priorities of public well being providers throughout Europe, waste of huge sums of public cash, and in addition unjustified scares and fears about well being dangers confronted by the European public at giant.
The Meeting notes that grave shortcomings have been recognized concerning the transparency of decision-making processes referring to the pandemic which have generated considerations concerning the attainable affect of the pharmaceutical trade on among the main choices referring to the pandemic.
The Meeting fears that this lack of transparency and accountability will lead to a plummet in confidence within the recommendation given by main public well being establishments. This may occasionally show disastrous within the case of the following illness of pandemic scope – which can grow to be way more extreme than the H1N1 pandemic …
The rapporteur considers that among the outcomes of the pandemic, as illustrated on this report, have been dramatic: distortion of priorities of public well being providers throughout Europe, waste of big sums of public cash, provocation of unjustified worry amongst Europeans, creation of well being dangers by means of vaccines and drugs which could not have been sufficiently examined earlier than being authorised in fast-track procedures, are all examples of those outcomes.”
Even Forbes wrote in 2010 that “from the start the World Well being Group’s actions have ranged from the doubtful to the flagrantly incompetent.” A poignant quote:
“The WHO’s doubtful choices exhibit that its officers are too inflexible or too incompetent (or each) to make wanted changes within the pandemic warning system — deficiencies we’ve come to count on from a corporation that’s scientifically challenged, self-important and unaccountable.
The WHO might be able to carry out and report worldwide surveillance — i.e., depend numbers of instances and fatalities — however its coverage position ought to be drastically restricted.
U.N. bureaucrats pose as authorities on all method of merchandise, public coverage and human actions, from desertification and biodiversity to the regulation of chemical compounds, makes use of of the ocean and the testing of genetically engineered vegetation.
Nevertheless, the U.N.’s regulatory insurance policies, necessities and requirements usually defy scientific consensus and customary sense. Its officers aren’t any buddies of commerce, public well being or environmental safety. The result’s a extra precarious, extra harmful and fewer resilient world. In relation to pestilence, the U.N. will be the best plague of all.”
What’s a Pandemic, Anyway?
It’s noteworthy that simply earlier than the WHO declared a pandemic, they modified the definition of the phrase. From the British Medical Journal:
“WHO for years had outlined pandemics as outbreaks inflicting “huge numbers of deaths and sickness” however in early Could 2009 it eliminated this phrase — describing a measure of severity — from the definition.
Key scientists advising the World Well being Group on planning for an influenza pandemic had finished paid work for pharmaceutical corporations that stood to realize from the steering they had been getting ready. These conflicts of curiosity have by no means been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its dealing with of the A/H1N1 pandemic as ‘conspiracy theories.’
A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered proof that raises troubling questions on how WHO managed conflicts of curiosity among the many scientists who suggested its pandemic planning, and concerning the transparency of the science underlying its recommendation to governments.
Was it acceptable for WHO to take recommendation from consultants who had declarable monetary and analysis ties with pharmaceutical firms producing antivirals and influenza vaccines?”
Boasting Concerning the Methods
In 2019, Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, gave a chat on the ESWI/Chatham Home Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Convention. At round 13 minutes in, he boasted about how he “misused the truth that that the highest, high soccer … soccer golf equipment in Belgium inappropriately and in opposition to all agreements vaccinated … they made their soccer gamers precedence folks.” The viewers responded with laughter.
“Belief WHO”
With the intention to perceive the corruption contained in the WHO, one might need to watch a pre-pandemic documentary known as “Belief WHO,” produced by Lilian Franck. Amongst different issues, it appears to be like into varied conflicts of curiosity in addition to the examples of how the group has been influenced by the tobacco trade and the nuclear trade.
The United Nations Has Been Hijacked
Final yr, I interviewed Mary Otto-Chang, a former United Nations worker, who talked concerning the hijacking of the UN and the 2019 settlement between the UN and the World Financial Discussion board that the Fourth Industrial Revolution as a cooperation objective.
So what we’re taking a look at is utilizing the authority of the UN as supposedly a simply and fantastic worldwide group that protects the folks for the industrial and philosophical objectives of the richest folks of the world. What an intricate lie!
Banality of Evil
Most horrible issues that individuals do to one another don’t come out of nowhere. There may be often a “warm-up” interval throughout which evil actions are trivialized, and folks’s senses are “re-trained.”
Typically, utilizing upside-down language, folks’s senses are re-trained to the extent of swapping out the meanings fully, the place battle turns into peace, and homicide turns into compassion. It takes time to dehumanize total demographics — primarily based on a selected ethnicity, or faith, or well being standing, or some other arbitrary affiliation.
For instance, in early Nazi Germany, there was a marketing campaign to kill mentally disabled youngsters, (and in addition do inhumane experiments on them), and the dad and mom had been usually informed that their youngsters had been being taken away for higher care. The dad and mom didn’t know that their youngsters had been being murdered — however the nurses who killed the disabled knew precisely what they had been doing, however maybe a few of them believed that they had been performing acts of mercy!
There’s a highly effective, must-see documentary about it, known as, “The Killing Nurses of the Third Reich.” I wrote about it final yr:
“The one factor that was wanted for the nurses to make the transition to the horror zone was to resolve that the poor struggling imbeciles had no company. As quickly as of their minds, the nurses stripped the disabled youngsters and the mentally unwell adults of their human company and turned them into creatures akin to struggling pets, killing them turned virtuous. The nurses held the disabled infants lovingly, after which killed them.”
Our Selections Matter
One thing that I’ve been interested by quite a bit over the course of my life is how our selections have long-term penalties: for ourselves, for the folks round us, and even for the historical past of the world!
For instance, to return again to the subject of pandemic preparedness, a lot of what occurred within the U.S. in 2020 was made attainable due to Bush’s 2005 determination to redo the pandemic preparedness plan. Who paid any consideration to it again in 2005? Who may think about that it could have such a profound impression on our lives? No person, in all probability, apart from the individuals who deliberate it. And but right here we’re …
Or one other instance. When folks settle for censorship in opposition to the teams that they don’t relate to, they usually don’t suppose that the censors are coming for them subsequent — and but most of the time, that’s precisely what occurs.
Or generally, a selection that we make at a really younger age comes again to us years later, and no matter we tried to flee stares us straight within the face, and we’ve to cope with it anyway.
Which is to say, braveness and making an attempt to do the fitting factor are usually not solely praise-worthy, they’re additionally very sensible, particularly throughout difficult occasions.
There may be most actually no components, and no common prescription for a time like this nevertheless it’s essential to see the scammers in excessive chairs for who they’re (together with after they discuss pandemic preparedness treaties “for our personal good”), and to see by means of them with out being afraid. Once we stand collectively, with love in our hearts, we’re robust.
Concerning the Writer
To seek out extra of Tessa Lena’s work, make sure to take a look at her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.
