The globalists that introduced us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place is now exhausting at work on the following section of this New World Order.
The World Well being Group has began drafting a world pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that might grant it absolute energy over world biosecurity, equivalent to the facility to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, obligatory vaccinations, journey restrictions, standardized medical care and extra.
In “The Corbett Report”1,2 above, impartial journalist James Corbett evaluations what this treaty is, the way it will change the worldwide panorama and strip you of a few of your most simple rights and freedoms. Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct assault on the sovereignty of its member states, in addition to a direct assault in your bodily autonomy.
A Backdoor to International Governance
As famous by anti-extremism activist Maajid Nawaz in an April 28, 2022, Twitter submit,3 the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to world empire.”
COVID-19, whereas doubtlessly lethal to sure susceptible teams, merely isn’t a sound justification for handing over extra energy to the WHO, particularly in gentle of its many inexplicable “errors” on this and former pandemics.
As only one instance, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne till the tip of December 2021,4 but scientists knew the virus was airborne inside weeks of the pandemic being declared.5 The WHO additionally ignored early recommendation about airborne transmission.6
So, it appears clear that the hassle to now hand over extra energy to the WHO is about one thing apart from them being probably the most certified to make well being selections that profit and shield everybody.
It appears much more seemingly that the WHO is being put in as a de facto governing physique for the worldwide Deep State.7 By means of the WHO, underneath the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who search to personal every thing and management everybody, will then be capable to implement their needs throughout the entire world in a single fell swoop.
With this treaty in place, all member nations will probably be topic to the WHO’s dictates. If the WHO says each individual on the planet must have a vaccine passport and digital id to make sure vaccination compliance, then that’s what each nation will probably be compelled to implement, even when the individuals have rejected such plans utilizing native democratic processes.
As famous by Corbett, these negotiations are already properly underway,8 and the treaty is predicted to be absolutely applied in 2024 — that’s, except the individuals of the world get up to what’s taking place and beat again this monstrosity.
WHO Seemingly In search of to Monopolize Well being Care Worldwide
Below the guise of a world pandemic, the WHO, the World Financial Discussion board (WEF) and all its put in leaders in authorities and personal enterprise, had been capable of roll out a plan that had already been a long time within the making. The pandemic was an ideal cowl.
Within the title of preserving everybody “secure” from an infection, the globalists justified unprecedented assaults on democracy, civil liberties and private freedoms, together with the proper to decide on your individual medical therapy.
Now, the WHO is gearing as much as make its pandemic management everlasting, prolong it into the well being care programs of each nation, and finally implement a common or “socialist-like” well being care system as a part of The Nice Reset.
Whereas this isn’t at present being mentioned, there’s each purpose to suspect that that is a part of the plan. WHO Director-Common Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has beforehand acknowledged that his “central precedence” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world towards common well being protection.9
And, contemplating the WHO modified its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a illness,”10 with out the unique specificity of extreme sickness that causes excessive morbidity,11,12 absolutely anything may very well be made to suit the pandemic criterion. The entire premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared risk requires shared response.” However a given risk is sort of by no means equally shared throughout areas.
Take COVID-19 for instance. Not solely is the chance of COVID not the identical for individuals in New York Metropolis and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the identical for all of the individuals in these areas, as COVID is extremely depending on age and underlying well being situations.
The WHO insists that the treatment is similar for everybody in all places, but the dangers differ broadly from nation to nation, area to area, individual to individual. They intend to remove individualized medication and supply blanket rulings for the way a given risk is to be addressed. Doubtless, this will solely lead to pointless struggling, to not point out the lack of particular person freedom.
How the WHO Has Wielded Earlier Pandemic Devices
To present us an concept of how the WHO may find yourself misusing this new proposed worldwide “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, we are able to have a look at the Worldwide Well being Laws (IHR),13 which the U.S. signed on to in 2005.
The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Well being Emergency of Worldwide Concern (PHEIC).14 This can be a particular authorized class that permits the WHO to provoke sure contracts and procedures, together with drug and vaccine contracts.
As famous by Corbett, the IHR permits the unelected director-general of the WHO to easily declare a PHEIC and, all of the sudden, all member states have to bounce to his tune. It principally grants the WHO dictatorial powers over well being coverage.
PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, after all, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020. All of those PHEICs had been poorly dealt with and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt15 of their wake.
So, to summarize, by the IHR, the WHO has already been considerably empowered to dictate world well being coverage with regard to pandemics, and so they used that energy to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of {dollars} on countermeasures, particularly medicine and vaccines, that didn’t work very properly.
In that sense, the WHO is admittedly simply one other wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Huge Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, whereas the individuals of the world are left to endure the implications of fast-tracked vaccines. Its dealing with of the COVID pandemic specifically has been unprecedentedly dangerous, as they had been behind the withholding of early therapy with secure medicines worldwide.
As famous by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie,16 the WHO has additionally claimed the mRNA photographs as secure as typical vaccines, which is nowhere close to the reality. Most all accessible knowledge show they’re probably the most harmful medicine ever created. Why would anybody anticipate the WHO to change into much less corrupt if given much more energy and management?
IHR Amendments Could Additionally Limit Rights and Freedoms
Now, the IHR overrode and outdated the U.S. Structure from the beginning, however in January 2022, the U.S. additionally submitted regulatory amendments17 that can give the WHO much more energy to limit your rights and freedoms.
Could 22 by 28, 2022, the World Well being Meeting will collect and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if handed, they are going to be enacted into worldwide regulation. These submitted amendments are along with the WHO pandemic treaty at present underneath dialogue. As reported by Well being Coverage Watch, February 23, 2022:18
“Washington needs to quick monitor a sequence of nitty-gritty, however far-reaching modifications within the current Worldwide Well being Laws that govern WHO and member state emergency alert and response — for consideration at this 12 months’s World Well being Meeting, 22-28 Could.
The U.S. proposal19 for main IHR rule modifications, obtained by Well being Coverage Watch, has been a subject of dialogue in a sequence of closed-door conferences of WHO member states, that are contemplating methods to reform the present IHR, in addition to advancing an entire new WHO conference or different worldwide instrument20 on pandemic prevention and response …
The U.S. is predicted to steer a parallel monitor of tightly-paced ‘casual’ member state negotiations to achieve consensus on an IHR reform decision for approval at this 12 months’s seventy fifth WHA [World Health Assembly] …”
The “new WHO conference or different worldwide instrument” talked about right here refers back to the WHO treaty at present underneath dialogue. An intergovernmental negotiating physique (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Well being Meeting in December 2021,21 for the aim of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as talked about, this INB has begun that work.
Nonetheless, as famous by Corbett, that is solely the second time within the WHO’s historical past that an INB has been established. The primary one was the INB of the WHO Framework Conference on Tobacco Management,22 22 years in the past. So, this isn’t a well-established course of, and it’s exhausting to foretell the way it will play out.
Invoice Gates Builds GERM Group for the WHO
One other clue about what the WHO intends to do with extra energy comes from its major funder, Invoice Gates. Gates lately introduced he’s constructing a pandemic response workforce for the WHO, which he wish to be referred to as the “International Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Group.
This workforce will probably be made up of hundreds of illness specialists underneath WHO’s purview, and can monitor nations and “determine when they should droop civil liberties, drive populations to put on masks and shut borders,” The Counter Sign reviews.23
After all, Gates can be the most important funder of the WHO (once you mix the donations from each his basis and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and different relationships converse volumes concerning the corruption nonetheless ruling the WHO. On the finish of the day, Gates is principally paying the WHO to dictate to the world what they need to do to make Gates a ton of cash. As famous by The Counter Sign:24
“Gates’ announcement of the GERM workforce coincides with the World Well being Group’s drafting of a world pandemic treaty … Sooner or later, the pandemic treaty is not going to solely be certain that member states abide by Worldwide Well being Laws however can even put the WHO within the driver’s seat, so to talk. Member states, together with the US and Canada, will take their orders immediately from the group. As Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis explains:
‘The treaty contains 190 nations and could be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what is taken into account a pandemic, and this might encompass broad classifications, together with a rise in cancers, coronary heart situations, strokes, and many others. If a pandemic is said, the WHO takes over the worldwide well being administration of the pandemic.
Of much more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO could be in full management over what will get referred to as a pandemic. They might dictate how our medical doctors can reply, which medicine can and might’t be used, or which vaccines are accepted. We’d find yourself with a one-size-fits-all method for the whole world … A one-size-fits-all response to a well being disaster doesn’t even work throughout Canada, not to mention the whole globe’ …
It isn’t unreasonable to imagine that the GERM workforce, as a brand new department of the WHO, would oversee ensuring member states adjust to the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and member states sign-on.
The following query, then, is how the WHO and Invoice Gates would be capable to monitor each particular person in each nation to find out whether or not sufficient persons are sick to justify locking a area down.
To this finish, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Methods to develop a world vaccine passport system,25 with plans to hyperlink each individual on the planet to a QR code digital ID … Thus, there will probably be one pandemic treaty, one GERM workforce, one world vaccine passport, and one World Well being Group to watch each individual on the planet.”
Below WHO Management, Vaccine Passports Are a Given
Certainly, whereas nations around the globe have scrubbed their COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO continues to be shifting forward with a world vaccine passport program.26
So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity guidelines for the world, you may wager they’ll insist on vaccine passports with built-in digital id and readiness for a centralized programmable central financial institution digital forex (CBDC). As reported by the Western Normal:27
“The WHO absolutely intends to supply help to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of the digital verification know-how for nations’ nationwide and regional verification of vaccine standing.
‘COVID-19 impacts everybody. Nations will due to this fact solely emerge from the pandemic collectively. Vaccination certificates which are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable construct belief. WHO is due to this fact supporting member states in constructing nationwide and regional belief networks and verification know-how.
The WHO’s gateway service additionally serves as a bridge between regional programs. It will also be used as a part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based data,’ mentioned Garrett Mehl, unit head of the WHO’s Division of Digital Well being and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s web site.”
Can We Cease the Worldwide Pandemic Treaty?
The query now could be, can we cease this “worldwide pandemic instrument” that the WHO is in search of? With quick discover, the WHO introduced it might settle for public touch upon the treaty for a complete of 5 days.28 The World Council for Well being (WCH) was among the many few that acted rapidly sufficient to submit a remark in opposition of the treaty. Lawrie delivered the WCH’s submission.29
In an April 26, 2022, replace on Substack, Lawrie wrote:30
“Regardless of the dearth of discover, many grassroots organizations did what they may to unfold the phrase and the World Council for Well being’s #stopthetreaty marketing campaign reached an astonishing 415 million individuals. A lot of you made written submissions expressing your considerations. So a lot of you actually, that I hear the WHO’s web site crashed on the final day.”
One one who missed the deadline was professor Robert Clancy, a number one scientific immunologist in Canada. He despatched the remark he would have wished to undergo Lawrie, who included it in her submit:31
“The proposal to take management of pandemics at a central WHO degree is untenable and threatens a world society. I’m in receipt of the World Council for Well being response, and the fantastically summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These considerations mirror the ‘throughout the board’ view of most Australian medical doctors …
The failure to grasp the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal an infection and the hazards of accrued suppression that follows senseless booster applications, and failure to interrogate the large databases relating to adversarial occasions of genetic vaccines are however two of the intense errors perpetuated by the WHO …
It’s foolhardy to even counsel {that a} ‘one dimension suits all’ response to a pandemic disaster throughout geographic zones characterised by vastly totally different parameters, may probably be lined by a central bureaucratic course of — the necessity for native resolution making is of prime significance.
The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship should decide any response to a pandemic, and present expertise the place the rule of the narrative has so distorted illness outcomes — supported by the WHO — should make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even better powers.
I write this as probably the most skilled Medical Immunologist in Australia, and a number one analysis scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a concentrate on ‘host-parasite relationship.’ Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”
Make Your Voice Heard in June
Whereas many, like Clancy, didn’t get an opportunity to take part, the WHO has introduced it’s going to permit for 2 extra days of public remark, June 16 and 17, 2022. As famous by Lawrie:32
“Please additionally pay attention to the proposed amendments to the Worldwide Well being Laws, to be voted on this Could on the World Well being Meeting.
Just like the pandemic treaty, that is one other transfer to grab better powers and override the sovereign legal guidelines of particular person nations. Some say that is extra important than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the lack of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguski has written extensively about this on his Substack.33
There appears to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to assault our sovereignty from all angles. It is necessary we make it clear that we don’t acknowledge the WHO as an authority over us and that we’ll not tolerate this abuse of energy.
We’re sovereign and won’t be certain by the undertakings of corrupt officers who fake to behave on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World’s Individuals. They don’t act for us and we is not going to be certain.”
I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June 16 and 17, 2022. Sadly, the WHO has not but launched any submission particulars. Your finest wager proper now could be to join the WCH’s publication. The final time, they issued hyperlinks and directions on submit your remark, and are certain to do the identical for the June submission window. You may subscribe on the backside of this web page, or on the WCH’s house web page.
To dam the IHR amendments on the Could 2022 World Well being Meeting, we have to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A listing of U.S. delegates could be present in Roguski’s Substack article, “Talking Fact to Energy.”
For contact data for different nations’ delegates, I might counsel contacting the regional workplace and ask for an inventory (see “Areas” within the blue part on the backside of the World Well being Meeting’s webpage). It’s additionally attainable that the WCH will publish steering on it, so make sure to join their publication.
